Our latest research, now published in the Summer Issue of Personnel Psychology, examines the intriguing dynamics of team passion and innovation. In a nutshell, our study delves into how the type of passion team members have for innovation—whether it's harmonious or obsessive—affects the team’s ability to reflect, adapt, and ultimately, innovate. Through two field studies involving over 280 teams, we discovered that harmonious passion leads to a more collaborative and innovative team environment, while obsessive passion, if not balanced properly, can pose challenges.
Here are some key takeaways for anyone leading or working in teams:
1. Reflect to Innovate: Innovation in teams requires team members to regularly pause to review and adjust their strategies together. This collective process, known as team reflexivity, helps teams reflect on their goals and methods and make necessary changes, leading to greater innovation.
2. Harness Harmonious Passion (HP): This type of passion comes from freely embracing innovation as a part of one's identity and balancing it with other life activities. It allows team members to be fully absorbed in their work while maintaining the flexibility to decide when to engage in it. This balanced passion fosters a positive, flexible, and innovative team environment.
3. Manage Obsessive Passion (OP): This passion is driven by an uncontrollable urge to engage in an activity, often due to internal pressures or self-esteem issues. While OP can lead to extreme dedication, it can also make team members rigid and less open to new ideas. A mix of high and low obsessive passion among team members can help maintain a healthy, reflective, and adaptable team environment.
4. Leadership Matters: As a team leader, encourage your team to take a step back now and then to reassess and adapt. Additionally, actions like encouraging everyone to contribute ideas and actively listening to team members can significantly boost team reflexivity.
Xin Wei (Renmin University of China), Hui Liao (University of Maryland), Zhi-Xue Zhang (Peking University), Yuntao Dong (Peking University), Ning Li (University of Texas at Dallas).